Artistic research

Bogdan Szyber

Forty-five years of site-specific performance practice, and six years of doctoral research into what that practice becomes once the academy takes charge of it.

The enquiry

Art has almost no general public interest. It becomes a public event only at the moment it presents itself as something other than art.

That proposition has organised my work since the early 1980s, long before I had a vocabulary for it. The method has been consistent: build a situation in a real place, at real scale, with real people, and withhold the frame that would let an audience file it as art. What the situation then produces — belief, outrage, retraction, administrative response — is the material.

From 1980 to 2024 that work was made with Carina Reich as the company Reich+Szyber: just over ninety productions, from mud tanks and drownings on small stages to opera houses, castle parks, water towers, bomb shelters and lighthouses. The complete catalogue, with dates, venues and collaborators, is documented at reich-szyber.com.

Between 2014 and 2020 I turned the same method on the institution that had begun to host it. That enquiry became Fauxthentication.

Doctoral research, 2014–2020

The project investigated the means of production of art made inside the boundaries of artistic research: what constitutes its value system, who or what is permitted to produce signs of that value, and for what reasons. It proceeded by institutional critique, critical intervention and site-specific case studies rather than by commentary.

The case studies tested the boundary in practice. I purchased art production online and had it delivered. I engaged a composer in Los Angeles and staged her performance to her instructions, inside the university. I exhibited ten per cent of all doctorate-holding artistic researchers in Sweden at the Swedish History Museum. Each case asked the same question from a different side: at what point does labour performed by someone else, somewhere else, become the researcher's own contribution to knowledge.

The examining committee failed the thesis unanimously. It was the first artistic doctoral thesis to be failed in Sweden. The work remains deposited and publicly available in full.

The decision was followed by sustained national debate in the Swedish press, a documentary by Swedish public television, and, in 2026, the Lars Vilks Stipend, awarded principally for the doctoral project. The thesis has been downloaded some eleven thousand times. I have not revised it. The argument it makes about the conditions of artistic research is the argument I would defend.

Concepts developed

Selected works carrying the enquiry

Bogdan Szyber holds up a burning copy of the thesis, a blowtorch in his hand, in front of laboratory glassware.
Fool’s Errand: an Alchemical Sonata · 2024 Photo: Anders Thessing

Dissemination and reception

Background

Born 1958 in Zabrze, Poland, of Polish-Ukrainian-Jewish descent; came to Sweden at the age of eleven. Trained in mime at Danshögskolan, Stockholm.

At twenty I spent a year at Friedrichshof in Austria — Otto Muehl's AAO commune, in the lineage of Viennese Actionism — followed by EST and other self-development movements. Those years are not biography attached to the work; they are the first fieldwork in it. Each was an organised apparatus for the production of authenticity, entered from the inside, and the questions they raised are the ones the doctoral project put to the university thirty-five years later.

Contact